The city for conlangs

Contents 1 New peer-reviewed journal subwiki 2 Criteria for inculsion? 3 Name 4 Apps 5 Question 6 links

[edit] New peer-reviewed journal subwiki

Much of the discussion at Wikipedia:Conlangs, and on some of the VfD debates, has centered around the lack of verifiability for many articles about artlangs due to the fact that no one has written about them except their authors; this is partly due to the fact that the zines devoted to conlangs died long ago and for the last few years we've had pretty much only the mailing lists and Zompist Bulletin Board as venues for discussion of conlangs, which don't serve quite the same purpose as a journal publishing in-depth articles (like Rick Harrison's Journal of Planned Languages or Steve Brewer's Journal of Unnecessary Languages). It would make sense to publish original research on various artlangs in the conlang wikicity, and at some point later, if it seems warranted, do articles at Wikipedia for the most notable of them.

I propose that we start a peer-reviewed journal here. The structure might be something like this:

1. A main page that would have links to the most recently published articles, with brief excerpts from them, and links to an archive page that has links to all articles ever.
2. A submissions page where people put links to new articles, and where peer reviewers record comments and votes. The author can revise the article in response to peer comments. If after some period 2/3 of the commenting reviewers approve the article, it goes to the published articles section on the main page and the archive. If it fails to get supermajority approval, it goes to another archive, and if it gets maybe 2/3 votes against it may be deleted.
3. A drafts page where authors can put wikilinks to new articles in progress, later moving the links to the submissions page when they consider the article finished.

The idea is that these articles will be mostly written by people other than the creator of the conlang in question, and they need not be NPOV or avoid original research like articles at Wikipedia. Articles by conlang creators would be welcome too, especially replies to earlier-published articles about their languages by other people, but also articles about the process of creating language X and what they learned from it, etc. --Jim Henry 17:19, 12 Aug 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Criteria for inculsion?

Hi,

As co-creator of a constructed lanaguge called Portal whose inital thoughts were devlope don IRC over the past two days, I was wondering what the critera for inclusion here were?

How well known does a conlang have to be before it can appear on here?

Thanks... ShakespeareFan00 19:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Any conlang that is beyond a simple sketch may be included in this wiki. Sketch languages, that are being actively developed by a community may also be included in this wiki. Personal sketches should not be included.

--Carlos Th (talk) 04:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Name

When I create a language, should I just make up a name for the language? Just like that? Like, "your name shall be Spfarshcian"? – Smiddle 12:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes. Perhaps you could think of a word which means something in your new language. For example, "Esperanto" means "one who hopes" in Esperanto and "toki pona" means "good language" in toki pona. Angela ^talk 18:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay. – Smiddle 18:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Apps

Are there apps to create conlangs? --84.139.88.53 14:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I created a python skript. Can be downloaded here: two.xthost.info/randlang/randlang.zip. --KA 15:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question

When I create a language here, does it have to be a bit notable? Or can I just create it right off the bat without any speakers of the language yet? Thanks. --TheMaskedMeerkat 16:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

It doesn't need to be notable. You're welcome to create a completely new language here. Angela ^talk 11:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok, then! Thanks. TheMaskedMeerkat 01:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] links

I removed the links in the left pane. I've checked all and none are active enough to be worthy of merit. HYENASTE 03:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)